🔗 Share this article

The number of guaranteed seats for Māori representatives on New Zealand local authorities is set to be slashed by more than half, following a controversial law change that forced municipal councils to submit the fate of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a popular referendum.

Historical Context on Indigenous Representation

Indigenous electoral districts, which can include multiple councillors depending on demographic data, were established in 2001 to provide Māori electors the choice to vote for a guaranteed Indigenous council member in municipal and provincial governments. Originally, local governments could only establish a Māori ward by initially submitting it to a public vote in their area. Local populations frequently devoted considerable time building community backing and urging their councils to establish Māori wards.

Policy Changes and Government Actions

To remedy the issue, the former administration permitted local councils to set up a Māori ward without first requiring them to subject it to a popular ballot.

However, this year, the current administration overturned the policy, stating communities ought to determine whether to introduce Indigenous representation.

Voting Outcomes

The new legislation required councils that had created a electoral district under the previous policy to hold binding referendums alongside the local body elections, which ended on October 11. Out of 42 local governments taking part in the public vote, 17 voted to retain their seats, and 25 to abolish theirs – revealing many regions against reserved Indigenous seats.

These outcomes provided “a vital step in restoring community self-determination.”

Opposition parties however have condemned the government’s law change as “discriminatory” and “against Indigenous interests”. Since taking office, the current administration has implemented sweeping rollbacks to policies designed to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. The government has said it aims to end “race-based” policies, and asserts it is committed to improving outcomes for Māori and every citizen.

Urban-Rural Divide

The results of the public votes were divided down city-country divisions – most cities required to vote backed Māori wards, while countryside areas leaned strongly towards removing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Māori wards that had recently been established – they’re only just starting to hit their stride.”

Voter Turnout and Concerns

The recent local government elections recorded the lowest voter turnout in over three decades, with less than a third of eligible voters casting a vote, leading to demands for reform.

This approach had been “a mockery”.

Differential Standards

Councils are able to create different electoral districts – including countryside seats – without first requiring a public vote. The disparate requirements applied to Indigenous representation suggested the administration was singling out Māori representation.

“Well, they failed. Numerous localities have expressed strong opposition.”

This remark concerned the 17 regions that voted to retain their wards.